Please note this application is under active development. If you spot any errors or something isn't working, please contact us at evidence.service@wales.nhs.uk.

Strategies for increasing participation in mail-out colorectal cancer screening programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Goodwin et al (2019)

Health Evidence - 10.1186/s13643-019-1170-x

Evidence Categories

  • Care setting: Not described
  • Population group: Adults
  • Intervention: Reminder/recall services
  • Intervention: Printed materials
  • Intervention: Self-Sampling Kit
  • Intervention: Digital Interventions
  • Intervention: GP Referral
  • Outcome: Screening: Uptake of colorectal cancer screening

Type of Evidence

Systematic Review

Aims

The current study systematically reviews interventions applied to increase fecal occult blood test (FOBT) kit return, specifically in population mail-out programs.

Findings

The review identified 53 interventions from 30 published studies from which nine distinct intervention strategy types emerged. Sensitivity analysis showed that the risk of bias marginally moderated the overall effect size. Pooled risk ratios and confidence intervals for each intervention type revealed that telephone contact RR = 1.23, 95% CI (1.08–1.40), GP endorsement RR = 1.19, 95% CI (1.10–1.29), simplified test procedures RR = 1.17, 95% CI (1.09–1.25), and advance notifications RR = 1.09, 95% CI (1.07–1.11) were effective intervention strategies with small to moderate effect sizes. Studies with a high risk of bias were removed and pooled effects remained relatively unchanged.

Conclusions

Interventions that combine program-level changes incorporating the issue of advance notification and alternative screening tools with the involvement of primary health professionals through endorsement letters and telephone contact should lead to increases in kit return in mail-out CRC screening programs.

Also In This Category

    No other evidence in this category.