Sylwer fod y cymhwysiad hwn dan ddatblygiad. Os ydych chi'n gweld unrhyw gamgymeriadau neu os nad yw rhywbeth yn gweithio, cysylltwch â ni yn evidence.service@wales.nhs.uk.

Interventions to improve mental health and well-being in care-experienced children and young people aged less than 25: the CHIMES systematic review

Evans et al., (2024)

National Institute for Health and Care Research - https://doi.org/10.3310/MKYP6299

Mapiau Tystiolaeth

  • Lleoliadau Gofal: Lleoliad gofal preswyl (plant)
  • Grwpiau Poblogaeth: Oedolion ifanc
  • Grwpiau Poblogaeth: Oedran cyn-ysgol (dan 5 oed)
  • Grwpiau Poblogaeth: Oedran ysgol gynradd (5-11)
  • Grwpiau Poblogaeth: Oedran ysgol uwchradd/coleg (11-18)
  • Grwpiau Poblogaeth: Plant a phobl ifanc "mewn perygl"
  • Ymyriadau: Hyrwyddo/addysg iechyd Neu Ymyriadau sy'n seiliedi
  • Ymyriadau: Seicotherapi
  • Ymyriadau: Meithrin Dyfodol Iach (FHF)
  • Ymyriadau: Datblygiad emosiynol didactig
  • Canlyniad: Canlyniadau llesiant cymdeithasol, emosiynol a med

Math o Dystiolaeth

Adolygiad Systematig

Nodau

Dywed yr awduron:

"The CHIMES review is a complex-systems-informed mixed-method systematic review that aimed to synthesise the international evidence base for interventions addressing the mental health and well-being of care-experienced children and young people (age ≤ 25 years) and to assess the potential transportability of this evidence base to the United Kingdom context"

Canfyddiadau

Dywed yr awduron:

"We identified 64 interventions from 124 study reports. Interventions were primarily evaluated in the United States and targeted young people’s competencies or carers’ parenting practices. Meta-analysis reported limited evidence that interventions effectively improved mental health in the shorter term (0–6 months): total social, emotional and behavioural problems (d = −0.15, 95% confidence interval −0.28 to −0.02); internalising problem behaviours (d = −0.35, 95% confidence interval −0.61 to −0.08); externalising problem behaviours (d = −0.30, 95% confidence interval −0.53 to −0.08); depression and anxiety (d = −0.26, 95% confidence interval −0.40 to −0.13) and social–emotional functioning difficulties (d = −0.18, 95% confidence interval −0.31 to −0.05), but these impacts were not observed in the longer term (> 6 months).

 

Five key context factors potentially explain challenges to implementation and acceptability: lack of system resources; the time, cognitive and emotional burden of delivery or participation; interprofessional tensions; the devaluing of young people, meaning that they felt unable to express dissatisfaction with interventions; and the devaluating of carers’ expertise and needs. From the evidence, stakeholder consultation identified two priority interventions: (1) mentoring by individuals with knowledge and experience of care and (2) system and ethos change to create harmonisation between organisations and facilitate interprofessional relationships. Well-being and suicide-related behaviours are priority outcomes alongside mental health."

Casgliadau

Dywed yr awduron:

"The review identified some evidence for interventions impacting mental health in the short term. There is a lack of system-level interventions and approaches that target subjective well-being and suicide-related outcomes. Future intervention might prioritise mentoring and targeting system culture."